Well if you had come from martin.fredriksson @ hotmail.se I think the outcome would have been different. You were followed closely by 10 negative votes being Swedin and Anders-E were two of the negative. Both have previously shown that they have an agenda, and rushed to the defense of Anna Ardin in prataomdet thread. So you were the first matter, you set the stone rolling. If your action was democratic, answer no! What's funny is that after the ten negative responses came destroy the two days more than that Amnesty're hiring. Wonderful is short and you as the sender might recognize your real reason
Amnesty did not get shot in the back, they turned abruptly on how spineless they are and you showed what kind of journalist you are. You have never defended the Constitution as the fire bombs and stones throw left you represent, but your purpose is undoubtedly to go extreme feminist issues. There is no honor in it, just as there is when you shoot even setting dist the march.
Original flashback: https://www.flashback.org/sp39619537