It is obvious to the enlightened.
Circumstantial evidence, that supports the thesis:
- first appeared J. A. voluntarily for questioning in Sweden, already the 30/8 2010
- and he was informed, that he after the hearing could leave the country, which he did
- and he has not committed any offense against any of the two women in question!
- and lack of forensic evidence, in the form of eg a used, damaged condom
- first, but may particularly, it applies Sweden solid State Feminism, which means that the state, in time and out of season, seeking extension of the term "rape" to include so much more than what the term originally meant to be and should mean.
Examples are not lacking.
- Guantánamobasen (how can it still be open and considered acceptable?) , m.fl.
Not more people react to this right rot, now so evident in Sweden, is scary!
In a true democracy, you are innocent until proven otherwise!
Neither more nor less.
Society B. notes again that the o-democracy Sweden tragically not a legally secure place to live. On the contrary!
No wonder JA avoid traveling back to Sweden.
In general: not very good tourist advertising for Sweden ... to put it mildly.
Question: cherish Sweden on tourism or not?