Quote:
Ursprungligen postat av trenterx
It's about dispel Marianne Ny's arguments. She states that she
must ask UK for permission to interrogate Assange on Ecuador's embassy.
Is it true or false? Bluffing she again? If she's bluffing, it is a
further embarrassment for Sweden.
Then it's not entirely clear that New gets what she wants in the end. If
the UK gets tired of the status quo can probably game plan change in
unexpected ways again.
|
I do not unfortunately be no argument can dispel the chief prosecutor
Marianne Ny's posture, because this is about something that is derived
from the original relationship between the state and the individual,
where power is right, the State (King) can do no wrong. Here it is also
about enforcing not only the Swedish national criminal law, but also EU
law (EAW) and then it should be no single set conditions. This is
reality.
Marianne Ny will test JA:s endurance and she has time on his side
for a while, because there will come another day when she must realize
that proof mode becomes worthless then she can come to close
investigation.
40103451
No comments:
Post a Comment
Only comments that benefit this cause are approved.
My time is precious I practice Mr Obama's freedom of speech.
Thanks for your support and time to visit us.