Who says AA/SW didn't doctor the condoms themselves so they could have WikiLeaks babies?

Flashback by: Theron

Citat:

Ursprungligen postat av Storm.Hatt
Apparently you sit in the lab and tearing condoms.
But what can this have for evidentiary value? You do not know who tore the condom or when it was torn apart. Perhaps torn apart during use. Or after use, by whom? If there was a minor injury in the front before intercourse so maybe the patient did not observe this. How can we prove intent? Learned CB at Quick-trials that you can get convictions with absurd proof?