Concerning extradition

Leyes

Act (1957:668) concerning extradition

Department

Justice Department BIRS

Done

1957-12-06

Changes inserted

SFS 2012:57 3

Source

Government Offices legal databases

Last downloaded

2012-09-1 3

(Expires 2012-10-16 00:00:00)

1 § The person in another state is suspected, accused or convicted of where straffbe law d deed and staying in this country may be decided by the Government extradited to the State in accordance with the provisions of this Act.

Team one will not apply if one team ( 1959:254 ) concerning extradition to Denmark, Finland, Iceland and Norway, or team a ( 200 3: 1156 ) on surrender from Sweden under a European arrest warrant applies in relation to the other state. Act (200 3: 1158).

(Valid 2012-10-16 00:00:00)

1 § The person in another state is suspected, accused or convicted of where straffbe law d deed and staying in this country may be decided by the Government extradited to the State in accordance with the provisions of this Act.

Team one will not apply if one team ( 200 3: 1156 ) on surrender from Sweden under a European arrest warrant, or law a ( 2011:1165 ) on surrender from Sweden according to a Nordic arrest warrant is applicable in relation to the other state. Teams (2011: 1166).

Preconditions for Extradition
2 § A Swedish citizen can not be extradited under this Act. Teams (200 3: 1158).

3 § Repealed by Act (200 3: 1158).
3 a § Repealed by Act (200 3: 1158).
3 b § Repealed by Act (200 3: 1158).
3 c § Repealed by Act (200 3: 1158).

4 § Extradition may be granted only if the act for which extradition is sought equivalent offense for which under Swedish law provides imprisonment for one year or more. Has the person in the requesting state convicted of the offense, he may be extradited only if the sentence is less than imprisonment for four months or other disposal of the institution during the same time.

Should disclosure be made ​​to another state for the act referred to in the first paragraph , get extradition to the State but also granted for another act corresponding offense under Swedish law.

Does the person in the requesting state has been sentenced to common sanction for an act referred to in the first paragraph , first sentence, and another act that corresponds to an offense under Swedish law, the extradition of Deeds granted, the common penalty is a minimum custodial sentence of four months or other disposal of institution during the same time. Teams (200 3: 1158).

5 § For the acts mentioned in the regulations in Chapter 16. Penal Code relating to crimes of the armed forces or in Chapter 21. Penal Code or the law of one ( 1994:1809 ) on total defense duty extradition may not be granted, subject to the provisions of an international agreement that is in force between Sweden and the applicant State.

This does not preclude that, if the offense also constitutes an offense for which extradition otherwise get done, extradite the person for that offense. Act (2004:1001).

§ 6 Extradition shall not be granted for a political offense.

Includes deed also a crime that is not political, extradition may be granted for that offense, if the offense in the particular case considered in the nature of a non-political crime.

The first paragraph does not apply if one avs law on this basis would contravene an international agreement in force between Sweden and the applicant State. Teams (200 3: 1158).

7 § Not let him extradited, who because of his ancestry, membership of a particular social group, religious or political opinions, or otherwise because of the political conditions are at risk in the foreign state persecution, directed against his life or freedom or are otherwise of severe nature, or else there not enjoy security against to become sent to the state in which he runs such a risk.

8 § Extradition may not be granted, if in a particular case because of the intended person's youth, health or personal circumstances otherwise, with regard likewise the offense and the nature of the foreign state's interest, there is manifestly incompatible with the demands of humanity.

9 § If the person is requested extradition convicted of the offense in the foreign State, extradition may not be granted, unless the judgment is supported by the investigation, nor otherwise give rise to serious objection.

If the ruling on the act is not granted in the foreign state, the extradition request is based on the decision to arrest, issued by the competent authority of the foreign state. In terms of offense for which extradition can be made ​​according to § 4, second paragraph , may, however, request based on other evidence. The petition may not be granted, with less probable reasons are that the person committed the act.

By agreement with a foreign state may be determined, in relation to the state conviction or decision of arrest issued by the court or judge must be accepted, if it is not in the particular case, it appears that the judgment or warrant is obviously incorrect. In such an arrangement can be made ​​for them, which was given without the detainee was personally present at the hearing of the matter before the court, shall be admissible only if the offender's right to defend itself, however, can be considered to have been adequately satisfied or the offender, according to declaration the foreign state leaves the extradition case, is able to call my own courts that cater to that right. Act (1979:98).

10 § In the case of the wanted person in this country given them regarding the alleged crime or under Chapter 20. § 7 of the Code or the corresponding provision of the regulation announced decision not to prosecute the crime, get extradition for the crime is not granted.

Extradition may not be granted if the punishment for the offense would be barred according to Swedish law.

Has the question of responsibility for the crime tried by law akraftägande judgment given in a Member State other than the one who made ​​the request for extradition and the offense was committed in the first-mentioned State or is that State Party to the European Convention on Extradition on 1 December 3, 1957, or an agreement referred to in Chapter 2. 5 a § fourth paragraph of the Penal Code or has concluded a special agreement with Sweden on Extradition, the wanted person is not extradited for the offense;

• First if he or she has been acquitted,
• 2nd if he or she has been found guilty of the offense without penalty has been imposed,
• 3rd if the sanction imposed has been enforced in its entirety or in progress, or
• 4th if the sanction imposed has lapsed by law one of the state where the judgment was given.

The third paragraph does not apply in respect of offenses which have been committed in the State requesting extradition or against this State or assembly or a public institution in the State, or a crime, referred to in Chapter 2. 3 § 6 or 7 of the Penal Code , unless not team records occurred at the request of the State requesting extradition or after that the wanted person has been extradited from the state for marketing teams. Teams (200 3: 1158).

11 § The person in this country is prosecuted for any crime for which provides for imprisonment, or by a judgment against him to undergo imprisonment or otherwise disposed of in institutions, may not be disclosed as long as the obstacle betstår. The same law either, investigation has been instituted for an offense as aforesaid.

Notwithstanding the first paragraph said extradition may take place for trial if the act for which the foreign state's request, subject to the mercy later handed over to the Swedish authority as the Government. Act (1975:292).

12 § When granting the extradition school mutatis mutandis imposed the following conditions:

• First The person extradited may not, without prior consent under § 24 , in the foreign state prosecuted or punished for any crime committed before the transfer or, except in the cases referred to in 1:03 a.m. § second paragraph , extradited to another state, unless he failed that, although unimpeded from, to leave the country within forty-five days after the trial and after serving the sentence or other penalty that may have sentenced him for a crime, was extradited or returned there after he left the country.
• 2nd The person extradited may not be prosecuted for the crime in court, only for ad hoc or emergency conditions are empowered to try cases of such nature. Government may, however, permit derogations from this provision, if it is considered compatible with the rule of law.
• 3rd A person extradited may not be for the offense punishable by death.

In the cases referred to in 5 or 6 § forth in particular, that the person extradited may not be punished under any provision relating to crimes of the armed forces or as the political offense.

Otherwise, the government sets the conditions considered necessary. Act (1975:292).

12 a § As follows from an international agreement that is binding on Sweden, the person extradited, in addition to those required by § 12 first paragraph 1 , prosecuted or punished for any crime he or she committed before the extradition, if he or she has consented to it. Teams (200 3: 1158).

1:03 a.m. § If two or more states request extradition of sam person, toast, taking into account the nature of the offense, the time and place, therefore, frmställningarnas time sequence, the nationality and residence and other circumstances, be considered for the State extradition should take place.

When the requests relate to different offenses, it may be stipulated that the person extradited to a State shall, from the State re-extradited to another state on terms to be determined in accordance with § 12 .

The procedure

§ 14 A request for extradition shall be made in writing. It may be transmitted by fax or by agreement in the case, otherwise. The petition shall be filed with the Justice Department. At the request shall be accompanied by copy of the detention order or judgment referred to or, in the cases mentioned in § 4, second paragraph , other evidence on which the request is based. To the extent it is not clear from the documents, details of the person's nationality and permanent nature of the offense, time and place of the offense and in the requesting state applicable penal provisions. Alerts should be used whenever possible. Act (2001:612).

§ 15 Before the government issues a decision on the request, the opinion delivered by riksåk law breaker. Has not the person referred to manufacture consent to being extradited, the case shall be tried by the Supreme Court. Is it obvious that the petition should not be granted, it shall be immediately rejected. Act (1981:1090).

§ 16 Riksåk law is to be the basis for its opinion enforce the necessary investigation as regards the investigation of criminal cases.

Riksåk law breaker or travel teams are executing the investigation, the investigation may request additional information by the competent authority in another state if the other state allows it.

Coercive measures are what is generally prescribed for criminal cases. Decision by the court for an indefinite period until the matter has been settled or if extradition is granted, until it has been executed. If the Supreme Court that there are obstacles to extradition under 1 - § § 10 , however, the decision immediately cease to apply. If there is such a barrier to extradition referred to in § 11 first paragraph , the decision is not the time when the person on account of suspicion of crime referred to therein detained that arrested or detained or subjected to imprisonment or otherwise placed in institutional.

Coercive measures may also be made ​​after the extradition has been granted.

Court's decision in the case of coercive overK law as the Supreme Court, without any particular time.

Anyone who is detained in an extradition case may request a new hearing to be held within three weeks of the decision last made. Teams (200 3: 1158).

§ 17 Since the investigation is completed, submit riksåk law breaker case and the opinion of the Supreme Court. Has the person referred to manufacture consent to being extradited, the case and opinion instead handed over to the government. Act (1981:1090).

§ 18 The Supreme Court shall decide whether extradition law can certainly be granted as of 1 - 10 § § said.

If it is considered necessary, the hearing is held. A hearing may not be refused unless a previous hearing must be sufficient or the matter is clear. Regardless of the case pending in the Supreme Court, the question whether coercive measures considered by the High Court, unless the Supreme Court decides otherwise. Otherwise, the progress of the case what about criminal cases generally. The remuneration of public defenders, witness or other person consulted in the case shall the State, unless there are special reasons for it to be repaid by the wanted person. Act (1996:1628).

19 § Repealed by Act (1980:182).
§ 20 Since the Supreme Court decision issued, the matter be reported to the government. If the Supreme Court found the obstacles to extradition meet as one - § § 10 , may petition not be granted. By agreement with a foreign state may be determined that if the barriers been meeting under 8 or 9 § , the question to be referred to international arbitration.

When extradition is granted, the time-released, in which the requesting state should get the person to be extradited. Time will not, without serious reasons than one month from the date the requesting State has received the decision. The decision on extradition are enforced by the police. If the person to be extradited is at large, he or she may, if it is necessary for the extradition to be brought through custody and taken into custody by the police, however, more than forty-eight hours. Teams (200 3: 1158).
§ 21 When extradition is granted the Government may order any taken in the bes law shall be submitted to the foreign state, and may thereby provides the reservations for the sake of private rights or the public interest to be called for. Act (1975:292).
§ 22 Government or the Department of Justice decides on the compensation of public funds for public defenders to work with the government. Act (1992:109).

Coercive measures pending a request for extradition
2:03 a.m. § The person in the foreign country is suspected, accused or convicted of crimes, which under this Act may lead to extradition at the request of the competent authority of the foreign state or the occurrence of one where issued Wanted immediately arrested or imposed travel bans or reporting of the Year team are as generally applies if criminal. Bes Act may also be made ​​in such cases.

Decisions on the use of coercive measures shall without delay to the court, which promptly after the hearing as prescribed for criminal cases, shall examine the measure and, if the arrest or travel restrictions, notification shall be made, shall forthwith notify the Minister of Justice about it. Find him, to prevent extradition exists or that extradition would otherwise not be done, he has to seek the government's order revoking the action. Otherwise, the foreign state by the Justice Department be notified of the action. The request shall state given by the Minister of Justice appointed time, within which the request for extradition shall be made. This period may not be longer than forty days from the date the person was arrested or travel bans or reporting obligation was under the first paragraph . When an extradition request comes in, the Department of Justice immediately inform the authority that first decision on the measure. Such notification shall also be given if an extradition request is not received within the allotted time.

An action may be brought against the Court's decision. Anyone arrested or subjected to travel bans or reporting obligation is imposed, however, to consider whether the action should be, request a new hearing within three weeks from the last decision.

Have a request for extradition of the person arrested or subject to a travel ban, notification is not made ​​in accordance with the second paragraph appointed time, the person arrested shall be released or the travel ban, notification lifted. The same applies when an extradition request is refused under § 15 . If the arrested person not otherwise released, shall produce avlåtas to court for his detention last on the eighth day after, when riksåk Law pure received the request for extradition. Will not produce as aforesaid, the person arrested shall be released immediately. Act (2000:567).

Other provisions

§ 24 Notwithstanding the conditions set for the extradition own government on the production of the foreign state to admit that the person extradited may be held responsible for another before being extradited wrought offense than that for which extradition has been made, or extradited to another state. In the case of such a request shall apply mutatis mutandis to what is enacted on the extradition request. Consent may lämns alone if, as far as the documents show, extradition for the offense have teams certainly take place.

Apparent from the documents received, the request can not be law Recreational granted, or else the government will find reason to not want to go the petition, it shall immediately rejected. Otherwise examined the issue of the Supreme Court, unless the person referred to petition concedes this. Supreme Court finds that the obstacle exists, the request may not be granted. Act (1981:1090).

§ 25 Since the request for extradition has been made, may not be prosecuted for the alleged offense be instituted unless the petition avs its teams.

If extradition is granted after charge, that fact shall constitute inadmissibility in criminal proceedings. Act (1975:292).

(Expires 2012-10-16 00:00:00)

§ 26 The head of the Justice Department may grant that he who by a state extradited to another state must be passed through the kingdom, unless he is a Swedish citizen and there are no other compelling reasons against it. Production will be given to the Ministry of Justice.

Consent may be given to a Swedish citizen executed through Empire, the obstacles would not have existed for handing him or her to the receiving State in 2 or 4 § teams one ( 1959:254 ) concerning extradition to Denmark, Finland, Iceland and Norway.

If permission has been granted in accordance with the first or second paragraph of the police authority may, if it is necessary for the transport to be carried through, seize and take into custody the person extradited, however, more than forty-eight hours.

When permission to transport requested regarding someone extradited to a European Union Member State applied Chapter 8. § 2 teams one ( 200 3: 1156 ) on surrender from Sweden under a European arrest warrant instead of those in the first to third paragraphs . Teams (200 3: 1158).

(Valid 2012-10-16 00:00:00)

§ 26 The head of the Justice Department may grant that he who by a state extradited to another state must be passed through the kingdom, unless he is a Swedish citizen and there are no other compelling reasons against it. Production will be given to the Ministry of Justice.

If permission has been granted in accordance with the first paragraph of the police authority may, if it is necessary for the shipment to be carried through, seize and take into custody the person extradited, however, more than forty-eight hours.

When permission to transport requested regarding someone extradited to a State of the European Union, Iceland or Norway, apply Chapter 8. § 2 teams one ( 200 3: 1156 ) on surrender from Sweden under a European Arrest Warrant in place of the first and second paragraphs . Act (2011:1166).

26 a § Have extradition to Sweden for trial in this country, on condition that the person extradited later returned to the other state, the police authority in the place where the trial has taken place to ensure that the person extradited back.

If it is to be returned is at large, he may, if it is necessary for reunification to be the be, taken into custody and taken into custody by the police, however, more than forty-eight hours. Teams (200 3: 1158).

(Expires 2012-10-16 00:00:00)

26 b § If at a transport referred to in § 26 is an unplanned stopover in Sweden, the condition for carriage under that section may be requested, in the event that the shipment does not resume within twenty-four hours from landing. Permission to transport shall be requested within ninety-six hours from landing.

The police authority may, if it is necessary for the transport to be carried through, seize and take into custody the person extradited, but until then a request for a permit to transport has been examined. If authorization to transport is not claimed within the period specified in the first paragraph , the person shall be released immediately.

If permission for transport announced, then the provisions of § 26 third paragraph . The period shall be counted from the state announced.

In the case of Swedish nationals, the provisions of the second and third paragraphs only in the circumstances specified in § 26, second paragraph .

When there is someone who disclosed to a Member State of the European Union, applied Chapter 8. § 2 teams one ( 200 3: 1156 ) on surrender from Sweden under a European arrest warrant instead of this section. Teams (2005:50 3).

(Valid 2012-10-16 00:00:00)

26 b § If at a transport referred to in § 26 is an unplanned stopover in Sweden, the condition for carriage under that section may be requested, in the event that the shipment does not resume within twenty-four hours from landing. Authorization for transportation shall be requested within ninety-six hours from landing.

The police authority may, if it is necessary for the shipment to be carried through, seize and take into custody the person extradited, but until then a request for a permit to transport has been examined. If authorization to transport is not claimed within the period specified in the first paragraph , the person shall be released immediately. If permission for transport announced, the then 26 § second paragraph . The deadline shall be counted from the state announced. When there is someone who disclosed to a Member State of the European Union, Iceland or Norway, apply Chapter 8. § 2 teams one ( 200 3: 1156 ) on surrender from Sweden under a European arrest warrant instead of this section. Act (2011:1166).

§ 27 The government announces the international agreements referred to in this Act. Teams (200 3: 1158).

28 § Repealed by Act (200 3: 1158).
29 § Repealed by Act (200 3: 1158).
3:00 a.m. § Repealed by Act (200 3: 1158).
3:01 a.m. § Repealed by Act (200 3: 1158).
3:02 a.m. § Repealed by Act (200 3: 1158).
3:03 a.m. § Repealed by Act (200 3: 1158).
3:04 a.m. § Repealed by Act (200 3: 1158).
3:05 a.m. § Repealed by Act (200 3: 1158).
3:06 a.m. § Repealed by Act (200 3: 1158).
3:07 a.m. § Repealed by Act (200 3: 1158).
3:08 a.m. § Repealed by Act (200 3: 1158).
3:09 a.m. § Repealed by Act (200 3: 1158).
40 § Repealed by Act (2001:612).

Amendments and transitional provisions

1957:668

Authority

Justice Department BIRS

Preliminary work

Govt. 1957:156; 1LU 1957: 3 7; rskr 1957: 3 77

SFS code

1957:668

PROVISIONAL REGULATION

This Act comes into force on 1 January 1958. Law repeals one team a June 4 191 3 (No. 68) concerning the extradition of criminals.

Has the request for extradition made ​​before the new law even effect but has not been previously tested, finally, the matter shall be examined under the new bill. Regarding proceedings in the case may, however, elder law applied.

Provisions of the agreement with a foreign state, as far as Sweden is valid at the new law even effect, shall redound with even if they differ from what the law a statute.

1959:255

Scope

new § 26

SFS code

1959:255

1962:82

Scope

chg. § 3

SFS code

1962:82

1964:176

Scope

chg. 4 , 5 , 11 § §

SFS code

1964:176

197 3: 124

Preliminary work

Govt. 1972:1 3:02 a.m. , Juu 197 3: 1, rskr 197 3: 21

Scope

chg. § 18

SFS code

197 3: 124

1975:292

Preliminary work

Govt. 1975: 3 5 , Juu 1975:1 3, rskr 1975:112

Scope

upph. § 3 ; existing 25 , 26 § § denoted 26 , § § 27 , am. 1, 4, 9-12, 14-17, 20-24, the new § § 26 , new 25 §

SFS code

1975:292

PROVISIONAL REGULATION

This Act comes into force on 1 July 1975.

Provisions of the agreement with a foreign state, as far as Sweden is valid even when law enters into force, shall be complied with even if they differ from one law prescribes.

Act (1979:98) amending the law one (1957:668) on Extradition

Preliminary work

Govt. 1978/79: 80 , Juu 1978/79: 18, rskr 1978/79: 157

Scope

chg. 9 , 14 § §

Headline

Act (1979:98) amending the law one (1957:668) on Extradition

SFS code

1979:98

Act (1980:182) amending the law one (1957:668) on Extradition

Preliminary work

Govt. 1979/80: 80 , KU 1979/80: 45, rskr 1979/80: 269

Scope

upph. § 19

Headline

Act (1980:182) amending the law one (1957:668) on Extradition

SFS code

1980:182

Act (1981:1090) amending the law one (1957:668) on Extradition

Preliminary work

Govt. 1980/81: 154 , Juu 1981/82: 10, rskr 1981/82: 44

Scope

chg. 15 - 17 , 24 § §

Headline

Act (1981:1090) amending the law one (1957:668) on Extradition

SFS code

1981:1090

Act (1981:1297) amending the law one (1957:668) on Extradition

Preliminary work

Govt. 1980/81: 201 , Juu 1981/82: 1 3, rskr 1981/82: 54

Scope

chg. 2:03 a.m. §

Headline

Act (1981:1297) amending the law one (1957:668) on Extradition

SFS code

1981:1297

Regulation (198 3 168) for entry into force of the law of one (1979:98) amending the law one (1957:668) on Extradition

Scope

ENTRY INTO. of 1979:98

Entry

198 3 -06-05

Headline

Regulation (198 3 168) for entry into force of the law of one (1979:98) amending the law one (1957:668) on Extradition

SFS code

198 3: 168

Act (198 3 227) amending the law one (1957:668) on Extradition

Preliminary work

Govt. 1982/8 3: 91 , Juu 1982/8 3: 27, rskr 1982/8 3: 242

Scope

chg. 16 , 20 , 22 § § , new 26 a §

Entry

198 3 -07-01

Headline

Act (198 3 227) amending the law one (1957:668) on Extradition

SFS code

198 3: 227

Act (1986:658) amending the law one (1957:668) on Extradition

Preliminary work

Govt. 1985/86: 9 ,, 1985/86: 24, rskr 1985/86: 21:03

Scope

chg. § 5

Entry

1987-06-01

Headline

Act (1986:658) amending the law one (1957:668) on Extradition

SFS code

1986:658

Act (1992:109) amending the law one (1957:668) on Extradition

Preliminary work

Govt. 1991/92: 46 , 1991/92: JuU6, rskr 1991/92: 116

Scope

chg. § 22

Entry

1992-04-01

Headline

Act (1992:109) amending the law one (1957:668) on Extradition

SFS code

1992:109

Act (1994:2066) amending the law one (1957:668) on the extradition of crime

Preliminary work

Govt. 1994/95: 6 , bet. 1994/95: FöU1 , Comm 1994/95: 78

Scope

chg. § 5

Entry

1995-07-01

Headline

Act (1994:2066) amending the law one (1957:668) on the extradition of crime

SFS code

1994:2066

Act (1996:1628) amending the law one (1957:668) on Extradition

Preliminary work

Govt. 1996/97: 9 , bet. 1996/97: Juu 3 , Comm 1996/97: 55

Scope

chg. § 18

Entry

1997-12-01

Headline

Act (1996:1628) amending the law one (1957:668) on Extradition

SFS code

1996:1628

Act (1997:209) amending the law one (1957:668) on Extradition

Preliminary work

Govt. 1996/97: 88 , bet. 1995/96: JuU15 , Comm 1996/97: 198

Entry

1999-10-01

Scope

new 28 - 40 § § , rubr. preceding § 28

SFS code

1997:209

PROVISIONAL REGULATION

This Act comes into force on the day the Government. Teams one may be put into force in relation to any of the EU Member States.

Headline

Act (1997:209) amending the law one (1957:668) on Extradition

Förordning (1999:746) om ikraftträdande av lag en (1997:209) om ändring i lag en (1957:668) om utlämning för brott

Officiell version (PDF)

Scope

ikrafttr. av 1997:209 såvitt avser Tyskland och Spanien

Ikraft

1999-10-01

Headline

Förordning (1999:746) om ikraftträdande av lag en (1997:209) om ändring i lag en (1957:668) om utlämning för brott

Övergångsbestämmelse

Denna lag träder i kraft den 1 oktober 1999 i förhållande till Tyskland och Spanien.

SFS-nummer

1999:746

Lag (2000:567) om ändring i lag en (1957:668) om utlämning för brott

Officiell version (PDF)

Förarbeten

Prop. 1999/2000:61 , bet. 1999/2000:JuU19 , rskr. 1999/2000:216

Scope

ändr. 14 , 2 3 , 26 § §

Ikraft

2000-10-01

Headline

Lag (2000:567) om ändring i lag en (1957:668) om utlämning för brott

SFS-nummer

2000:567

Förordning (2000:701) om ikraftträdande i förhållande till Österrike och Nederländerna av lag en (1997:209) om ändring i lag en (1957:668) om utlämning för brott

Officiell version (PDF)

Omfattning

ikrafttr. av 1997:209 såvitt avser Österrike och Nederländerna

Ikraft

2000-09-27

Headline

Förordning (2000:701) om ikraftträdande i förhållande till Österrike och Nederländerna av lag en (1997:209) om ändring i lag en (1957:668) om utlämning för brott

Övergångsbestämmelse

Denna lag träder i kraft den 27 september 2000 i förhållande till Österrike och Nederländerna.

SFS-nummer

2000:701

Lag (2001:612) om ändring i lag en (1957:668) om utlämning för brott

Officiell version (PDF)

Förarbeten

Prop. 2000/01:8 3 , bet. 2000/01:JuU26 , rskr. 2000/01:281

Omfattning

upph. 40 § ;ändr. 1 , 2 , 4 , 6 , 10 , 14 , 16 , 26 , 28 , 3 2 § § , rubr. närmast före 1 , 2 3 § § sätts närmast före 2 , 24 § § , rubr. närmast före 2 § ;nya 3 , 3 a , 3 b , 3 c , 12 a , 27 a § § , rubr. närmast före 2 3 §

Ikraft

2001-10-01

Headline

Lag (2001:612) om ändring i lag en (1957:668) om utlämning för brott

SFS-nummer

2001:612

Förordning (2001:758) om ikraftträdande i förhållande till Luxemburg av lag en (1997:209) om ändring i lag en (1957:668) om utlämning för brott

Officiell version (PDF)

Omfattning

ikrafttr. av 1997:209 såvitt avser Luxemburg

Ikraft

2001-11-06

Headline

Förordning (2001:758) om ikraftträdande i förhållande till Luxemburg av lag en (1997:209) om ändring i lag en (1957:668) om utlämning för brott

Övergångsbestämmelse

Denna lag träder i kraft den 6 november 2001 i förhållande till Luxemburg.

SFS-nummer

2001:758

Förordning (2002:2 3 4) om ikraftträdande i förhållande till Storbritannien och Nordirland av lag en (1997:209) om ändring i lag en (1957:668) om utlämning för brott

Officiell version (PDF)

Omfattning

ikrafttr. av 1997:209 såvitt avser Storbritannien och Nordirland

Ikraft

2002-05-1 3

Headline

Förordning (2002:2 3 4) om ikraftträdande i förhållande till Storbritannien och Nordirland av lag en (1997:209) om ändring i lag en (1957:668) om utlämning för brott

Övergångsbestämmelse

Denna lag träder i kraft den 1 3 maj 2002 i förhållande till Storbritannien och Nordirland.

SFS-nummer

2002:2 3 4

Förordning (2002:722) om ikraftträdande i förhållande till Belgien av lag en (1997:209) om ändring i lag en (1957:668) om utlämning för brott

Officiell version (PDF)

Omfattning

ikrafttr. av 1997:209 såvitt avser Belgien

Ikraft

2002-10-14

Headline

Förordning (2002:722) om ikraftträdande i förhållande till Belgien av lag en (1997:209) om ändring i lag en (1957:668) om utlämning för brott

Övergångsbestämmelse

Denna lag träder i kraft den 14 oktober 2002 i förhållande till Belgien.

SFS-nummer

2002:722

Lag (200 3 :1158) om ändring i lag en (1957:668) om utlämning för brott

Officiell version (PDF)

Förarbeten

Prop. 200 3 /04:7 , bet. 200 3 /04:JuU8 , rskr. 200 3 /04:107, EGTL190/2002 s1

Ikraft

2004-01-01

CELEX-nr

3 2002F0584

Omfattning

upph. 3 , 3 a , 3 b , 3 c , 27 , 28 , 29 , 3 0 , 3 1 , 3 2 , 3 3 , 3 4 , 3 5 , 3 6 , 3 7 , 3 8 , 3 9 § § , rubr. närmast före 28 § ;nuvarande 27 a § betecknas 27 § ;ändr. 1 , 2 , 4 , 6 , 10 , 12 a , 16 , 20 , 26 , 26 a § §

SFS-nummer

200 3 :1158

Övergångsbestämmelse

• First Denna lag träder i kraft den 1 januari 2004.
• 2nd Äldre bestämmelser gäller fortfarande för ärenden om utlämning som har inletts vid ikraftträdandet.
• 3 . Äldre bestämmelser gäller i förhållande till en stat som den 1 januari 2004 var medlem i Europeiska unionen och som när ärendet inleds inte har genom fört rådets rambeslut 2002/584/RIF av den 1 3 juni 2002 om en europeisk arresteringsorder och överlämnande mellan medlemsstaterna1 3 , dock endast om ärendet har inletts före den 1 januari 2005.

Headline

Lag (200 3 :1158) om ändring i lag en (1957:668) om utlämning för brott

Lag (2004:1001) om ändring i lag en (1957:668) om utlämning för brott

Officiell version (PDF)

Förarbeten

Prop. 2004/05:7 , bet. 2004/05:FöU2 , rskr. 2004/05:44

Omfattning

ändr. 5 §

Ikraft

2005-01-01

Headline

Lag (2004:1001) om ändring i lag en (1957:668) om utlämning för brott

SFS-nummer

2004:1001

Lag (2005:50 3 ) om ändring i lag en (1957:668) om utlämning för brott

Officiell version (PDF)

Förarbeten

Prop. 2004/05:46 , bet. 2004/05:JuU 3 5 , rskr. 2004/05:288

Omfattning

ny 26 b §

Ikraft

2005-07-01

Headline

Lag (2005:50 3 ) om ändring i lag en (1957:668) om utlämning för brott

SFS-nummer

2005:50 3

Lag (2011:1166) om ändring i lag en (1957:668) om utlämning för brott

Officiell version (PDF)

Förarbeten

Prop. 2010/11:158 , bet. 2011/12:JuU5 , rskr. 2011/12:21

Ikraft

2012-10-16

Omfattning

ändr. 1 , 26 , 26 b § §

SFS-nummer

2011:1166

Övergångsbestämmelse

• First Denna lag träder i kraft den dag regeringen bestämmer. De nya bestämmelserna får sättas i kraft vid olika tidpunkter.
• 2nd Äldre bestämmelser gäller för ärenden om utlämning som har inletts före ikraftträdandet.

Headline

Lag (2011:1166) om ändring i lag en (1957:668) om utlämning för brott

Förordning (2012:57 3 ) om ikraftträdande av lag en (2011:1166) om ändring i lag en (1957:668) om utlämning för brott

Officiell version (PDF)

Omfattning

ikrafttr. av 2011:1166

Headline

Förordning (2012:57 3 ) om ikraftträdande av lag en (2011:1166) om ändring i lag en (1957:668) om utlämning för brott

SFS-nummer

2012:57 3