Swedish selective reporting

Flashback by: Espressino

Citat: Ursprungligen postat av Kaita 
If you look at the time span between the question is sent, the quick response and the publication of dn.se may question Bobby Velluccis anchoring of Swedish Amnesty setting. Amnesty is after all a voluntary and democratic association which should have secured such a principle decision to rule RECEIVING its parent organization.



Does Bobby V right to make the statement, that DN is now reported to be Swedish Amnesty's attitude?

How easy is it to move the focus and opinion, which is a scandal in itself. An email was enough to drive a wedge in a reputable organization like Amnesty. The question you should ask yourself is, it has happened before, with great sanolikhet yes. The Good MF seems to be a chastened man, who works in this way. It also puts the focus on the Expo, and the Research Group and their agendas and ultimately Robert Aschberg, MF was quick to deny by this twittret:

Citat:

Ursprungligen postat av Researchgruppen Researchgruppen ‏@Researchgruppen @rixstepnews would be more correct to say I did this for @researchgruppen since we've done a lot of work for feminist media. Visa konversation Svara Retweeta Favoritmarkera 23m Researchgruppen ‏@Researchgruppen @rixstepnews hey Rick, that's not correct. Just the email I happened to use at the time. //m

It original email was based on Piscatus, Robert Aschbergs companies

Ursprungligen postat av Martin Fredriksson,
Piscatus Den 27 september 2012 20:31 skrev
Martin Fredriksson < martin.fredriksson@piscatus.XX:

Hi

Is the Swedish Amnesty behind Amnesty International's statement on Assange? Ie it that Sweden should undertake to ensure that he shall not be disclosed to the U.S.?

Should not you can contact the main organization and inform them that the Swedish legal system does not represent any promises or guarantees in advance, that the judiciary is independent from political decisions and that there are no legal means in practice to give Mr Assange some sort of amnesty towards the U.S.?

I am also a supporter of Wikileaks but I think Assange should be examined for the crimes he is suspected in Sweden under the law, and that one should not make exceptions in the law just because a person has done much good. I thought that was a matter of Amnesty International as well, but I was apparently wrong, as Amnesty International now requires some sort of exception to Swedish law.

Do not understand how you will be able to have any credibility in the rule of law if you do not fix this.

Flashback by Kaita Citat: Ursprungligen postat av espressino How easy is it to move the focus and opinion, which is a scandal in itself. An email was enough to drive a wedge in a reputable organization like Amnesty. The question you should ask yourself is, it has happened before, with great sanolikhet yes. The Good MF seems to be a chastened man, who works in this way. It also puts the focus on the Expo, and the Research Group and their agendas and ultimately Robert Aschberg, MF was quick to deny by this twittret:

The original email was based on Piscatus, Robert Aschbergs companies Therefore, the question should be one turn to. Is this Swedish Amnesty's official position, to go against the AI? Bobby V needs enough democratic anchor such a setting. Have DN / TT drew a hasty conclusion on the basis of a simple email response? There is not even a press release what I can see ...

Flashback by Espressino

Citat:

Ursprungligen postat av Kaita

Därför bör frågan ställas ett varv till. Är detta svenska Amnestys officiella hållning, att gå emot Amnesty International? Bobby V behöver nog demokratiskt förankra en sådan inställning. Har DN/TT dragit en förhastad slutsats utifrån ett simpelt mailsvar? Det finns inte ens ett pressmeddelande vad jag kan se...

No, at first glance, it looks as if someone panicked and crafted together a politically correct answer! It was, after all, an outspoken feminist who got in, so the answer was in the cards.

http://www.fempers.se/ Disunited within Amnesty on guarantees for Assange
[Swedish:  http://www.fempers.se/2012/09/28/medveten-politik-bakom-enskilda-fall/ ]
[Translation:  http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fempers.se%2F2012%2F09%2F28%2Fmedveten-politik-bakom-enskilda-fall%2F

It will certainly be a continuation of this, so why not email Amnesty and ask the question, how the hell did this happen?

Edit: there appears to be an order of jobs feminist perspective

__________________ Senast redigerad av espressino Idag kl. 22:43.